Diego Novillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...]
| Seems to me that if C++ is all of the sudden interested in | dictating memory semantics for threaded programs, it should also | provide language capabilities for other synchronization models | and for threads (as in Java, though the memory model of Java used | to have problems of its own, dunno if they've been fixed). There has been formed a subgroup of the C++ evolution group looking at concurrency/threading. -- Gaby
