Robert Dewar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | One interesting thing to consider here is how the C++ semantics | compares with that of pragma Volatile in Ada, which is roughly | intended to be equivalent to volatile in C.
The suggestion made by Hans is to improve over the existing semantics in C++ (which is more or less copied from C90). Consequently, if Ada's is roughly equivalent to volatile in C, then I would say that the suggested semantics is roughly an improvement more or less over Ada's ;-). Seriously, could you give the Ada standardese even though I'm not supposed to understand? -- Gaby
