> From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> >> Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> (is this not feasible if the target is accurately described in rtl?) > > I don't know how to respond to this. I'm discussing a way to achieve > an incremental improvement in gcc. You seem to be discussing a > different compiler. I don't think my suggestions for incremental > improvement are relevant to creating your compiler: they don't help, > and they don't hurt. > > Perhaps somebody else has something to say about this, but I don't. > I'm a practical guy: I compile code with the compiler I have, not the > compiler I might want or wish to have.
- sorry, there's no need to respond; I need to concentrate on reality too.
