> From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian@airs.com> >> Paul Schlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Might this likely work? And if so, possibly be worthy of consideration to >> enable the more efficient description and optimization of traditional cc0 >> target machines (and possibly be beneficial for other ISA's as well)? > > It seems like it might work to me. It might be a reasonable direction > to move in down the road, if somebody does the work.
I'll try. Do you suspect it's best to define an extended syntax for set, or possibly just verify that multiple sets have equivalent source expressions, or something in between or otherwise?
