> Just to make sure I understand. I was thinking of whatever was > under $GCC/libiberty (and included). Are you thinking of something > more?
No. > A single patch is a huge stuff; I propose to break it into a series > of patches. Is that OK with you? I only want to avoid a situation where libiberty is left half converted (except short term, of course). The mechanics of the process are irrelevent to me.
