DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Just to make sure I understand. I was thinking of whatever was | > under $GCC/libiberty (and included). Are you thinking of something | > more? | | No.
OK. | > A single patch is a huge stuff; I propose to break it into a series | > of patches. Is that OK with you? | | I only want to avoid a situation where libiberty is left half | converted (except short term, of course). The mechanics of the | process are irrelevent to me. OK. I'm hold to convert all of liberbity. Thanks. -- Gaby
