> Isn't that what newlib is for...? "Should be" does not mean "is". I know libiberty has been used for this purpose in the past (remember the demangler in libstdc++ times?) so I wouldn't want to assume we aren't still doing it.
> I should be clear, though; I only want to make this assumption for > the host and build systems. That's hard for libiberty, where it is also used for target systems.
