DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > Would there be any objection to patches that convert function | > definitions in libiberty to use ISO C prototype style, instead of | > K&R style? | | I would be in support of such a patch iff it converts all the | functions, not just the ones gcc happens to use.
Just to make sure I understand. I was thinking of whatever was under $GCC/libiberty (and included). Are you thinking of something more? A single patch is a huge stuff; I propose to break it into a series of patches. Is that OK with you? -- Gaby
