Hello, > >at the beginning of the stage 1, there always is lot of major changes > >queued up. It never lead to unmanageable amount of "breakage and > >disruption". > > Other people have a different perception than you do. > > >As for constructive suggestions -- why not just forget on whole plan > >and let the things work out the way they always did? As you say, > >there is no perfect solution, so why to complicate people's lives with > >trying to get one? > > I can't say I found it incredibly thrilling to try to work out the > project ordering, and I certainly have plenty of other work to do. If > there's consensus that this was a bad idea, I'm happy not to do it > again. However, one person has already said that they found it valuable. > > I think it's a little early to start the post-mortem. Perhaps in Stage > 3, we could have a better discussion about how well this worked out. > Or, perhaps it will become obvious before then, one way or the other.
agreed. Anyway, thank you for all the work you spend on trying to make the whole thing work; while I have my objections against the idea, it may turn out that most of the people work in a different way and will actually prefer it (I admit to enjoy a controlled amount of chaos :-) Zdenek
