Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:47:03PM -0800, Matt Austern wrote: | > I'm sure there are still lots of horrible bugs, which will only be | > found with a more complete test suite. But the core functionality | > works, and at this point I think it'll improve faster in the CVS server | > than sitting on my hard disk. | > | > OK to commit to mainline? | | A namespace purity nitpick: | | You define a macro named tr1_hashtable_define_trivial_hash. Shouldn't | that be __tr1_hashtable_define_trivial_hash or something similar?
I think that may not be necessary. TR1 is experimental and people know what they are playing with and they just have to avoid evil macros when programming with C++. In that respect, TR1 is not different from ordinary third party library. More to the point, I hope that by the time we get to finalize the details in getting TR1 into the Working Paper, we also get to have equivalent of the #nospam preprocessor directive to limit the nuisance power of macros. -- Gaby
