On 2020-08-25 10:05 a.m., Jeff Law wrote: > On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 09:52 +0100, Roger Sayle wrote: >> Hi Dave, >> >> It's great to hear from you. It's been a long while. >> >> Sorry, doh! yes, there's a mistake in my patch (that I introduced when I >> renumbered >> the operands in the shd's define_expand to be the more logical 0, 1, 2, 3, >> then 4). >> Sorry for the inconvenience [due to my lack of familiarity with PA-RISC >> assembly]. >> Hopefully you should get much better mileage out of the attached revision. > FWIW this version 3-staged in my tester and is currently running the > testsuite. > It should finish testing later today. > > If David doesn't have objections, then I suggest going forward with the patch > independent of the others you've got queued up. The patch is fine. Testing completed this morning on hpux and there are no regressions.
Please install on trunk and gcc-10 branch. Thanks very much, Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
