On Sat, 2020-08-22 at 09:52 +0100, Roger Sayle wrote: > Hi Dave, > > It's great to hear from you. It's been a long while. > > Sorry, doh! yes, there's a mistake in my patch (that I introduced when I > renumbered > the operands in the shd's define_expand to be the more logical 0, 1, 2, 3, > then 4). > Sorry for the inconvenience [due to my lack of familiarity with PA-RISC > assembly]. > Hopefully you should get much better mileage out of the attached revision. FWIW this version 3-staged in my tester and is currently running the testsuite. It should finish testing later today.
If David doesn't have objections, then I suggest going forward with the patch independent of the others you've got queued up. jeff >
