Nick -

This is a rather eloquent (and/or disturbing?) vision of a potential trajectory of human-machine fusion.   I can't say I seek or approve to get on that trajectory myself, but it is not so inconceivable to me as to make me want to deny the possibility. If I wake up one day with said "voice in my head" I shouldn't be surprised... I do already engage with GPT (very occasionally) through the voice mode while in my car (because bluetooth) and it feels eerily like I have a friend riding along.

As I consider my building project, and enjoy the vicarious experience of watching a handful of young people (30somethings) on YouTube as they VLog their own building projects, I have imagined slapping on a pair of LLM enabled video glasses as I talk my way through the build with it.    I'm still not able to climb a ladder nor carry a bag of cement, so don't hold your breath... but I *did* wonder as I considered that what it would be like to have such a building "partner" in my ear the whole time.  If I put it off a year or two, the damn transformer models will probably be able to realtime monitor my work from my POV and advise me on many details which I myself am unaware of?  Meanwhile maybe someone will hack the Hypershell enough for the transformer to both sense and effect my leg articulation... even with a weak drop-foot, maybe it can compensate and all I have to do is mutter "up the ladder" or "get a bag of cement" and I'll find my exoskeleton/transformer turning that into action?   Can't wait to see if Hypershell.hk follows up with an upper-body exo to help me lift heavy beams on my own?

- Steve

On 1/25/25 9:08 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:
I dunno, David.  I have got some pretty eloquent stuff out of george.  It's odd, the more I treat him like a human, the more human he becomes.  (And the more he denies it.)  I hear you all crying out forth the ineffability of the human soul, but I don't really see it.  I think I am eminently eff-able. I figure if I talk long enough with George, he could definitely eff me.  I think a time will come when I can turn on a computer and listen to the voice "in my head".   It will not be generated by some interface to my brain, but rather by LLM as well educated in my habits of thought as am I.

 N

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 8:58 AM Prof David West <profw...@fastmail.fm> wrote:

    Pieter,

    I applaud your use of AI to improve your writing. It is my belief
    that the*"proper"* use of AI, along with computers and computing
    tools in general, is to _augment_ human abilities ala Vannevar
    Bush's "how we may think," Douglas Englebart's institute, Alan
    Kay's dynabook, (the fictional Young Ladies Primer of Stephenson's
    /Diamond Age/), and Jobs' "bicycle for the mind."

    This is in direct contrast, it seems, to the sentiments of most on
    this list who think that AI should, and inevitably will, replace
    "inferior" human intelligence.

    I am curious if you see any question of "voice" in the AI improved
    text? For example, I took glen's question as nothing more than an
    observation that the "voice" of your post seemed to that of
    ChatGPT instead of Pieter—definitely not *"augmented-Pieter,"* as
    I believe you intended it to be.

    All of us respect Pieter and value his words. If, however, we are
    confused by "voice." it raises issues of how much consideration
    the writing should receive and how we should respond.

    Improving oneself, and one's writing, is a great goal. And we all
    have experienced examples of "I wish I had said that," or "I wish
    I had expressed that idea as eloquently as she did." If AI tools
    provide wordings that you admire, or feel express your ideas more
    eloquently, you should adopt them.

    Personally, I do not believe that AI can ever provide more
    'eloquent' writing, only more precise or more complete writing. So
    I, again, strictly personally, would eschew using such tools as
    currently constructed. I would however, if I had the chance, use
    Richard Gabriel's tool, /Inkwell/, which, BTW, he emphatically
    states is not an AI, to enhance my writing. But Richard is
    primarily a poet and writer, despite his education and career in
    AI and computing, and he created /Inkwell/ expressly to be a
    writer's assistant. I have tremendous respect for Richard's
    writing and I know he uses Inkwell to enhance his intrinsic abilities.

    davew


    On Fri, Jan 24, 2025, at 10:48 PM, Pieter Steenekamp wrote:
    I was surprised by the comment "I hope I'm wrong. But that text
    reads like it was generated by an LLM"  At first, I just thought,
    'so what?' But it got me thinking about how AI changes how we
    communicate, which is really important to me.

    Here's my main point:

    I think it's okay to use others, whether they're people or AI, to
    help me communicate better, as long as the ideas are mine and I'm
    not copying someone else's work. If using AI to polish my words
    bothers someone, we can talk about it.

    Here's some background on why I think this way:

    a) Learning to communicate is one of the best things you can take
    away from school or university. For example if a student is
    supposed to use her own words in an assignment, then using AI or
    asking someone else to rewrite is wrong.

    b) In the workplace, we've always had people like personal
    assistants or speech writers. I see using AI in the same way,
    just a modern tool to help.

    c) Writing assistance used to be expensive because you needed
    people. Now, AI can do the job for free, and that doesn't go
    against what I believe is right.

    d) Your writing should still sound like you. So, I write
    something first, then ask AI to make it better but keep it simple
    and in my style, like, 'Please make this sound better but keep it
    easy to understand.' I now realise I violated this previously and
    will adapt.

    e) Maybe it's good, depending on the situation, to mention when
    you've used AI in your writing.

    f) Here's a funny story: I used AI to help write a message for an
    AI workshop, and someone complimented the writing so much they
    suggested I should be a writer instead!

    My bottom line:

    I plan to add a note at the end of each message in this group
    saying I used AI to help with my writing. If my using AI is a
    problem for anyone here, feel free to ask me to leave the group
    or simply remove me from the group.

    Note: I use AI to assist my writing.
    .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. ---
    -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   / Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe
    http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/


    .- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. ---
    -. --. / ... --- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
    FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
    Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom
    https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
    to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
    FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
    archives:  5/2017 thru present
    https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
      1/2003 thru 6/2021 http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/



--
Nicholas S. Thompson
Emeritus Professor of Psychology and Ethology
Clark University
nthomp...@clarku.edu
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson

.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p 
Zoomhttps://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribehttp://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIChttp://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru presenthttps://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
   1/2003 thru 6/2021http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.- .-.. .-.. / ..-. --- --- - . .-. ... / .- .-. . / .-- .-. --- -. --. / ... 
--- -- . / .- .-. . / ..- ... . ..-. ..- .-..
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
  1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to