While I appreciate DaveW's historical ensconcing, I think there's a different 
answer to EricS' question. When/if I feel generous to people who talk about the 
mind and thinking, I liken it to computation, in the trans-computer sense of 
portability ... the idea that you can run the same computation on different 
machines. The essentialist tendency, in that seemingly small domain, is 
well-exhibited by Turing's universal machines and, I think also, the conception 
that reality is information (another monism, I guess). I even see this in 
DaveW's attempt to reframe N=1 experimentation (scientific introspection), as 
an attempt to discover just how *expressive* that computation (someone's mind) 
can be. It's essentialism because it is a feature of all possible worlds. Even 
if our universe had no humans or animals, computation is still present. It's 
the only essence because it's the only feature present in all possible worlds.

My hitch, which prevents me from authentically playing that game, is that semantics requires full 
grounding. There is no such thing as pure portability. The same computation *cannot* occur on 
different machines. At best, you can shoe horn equivalence classes, like "for all intents and 
purposes, the DaveW computation is similar enough to the EricS computation", whereas "the 
Scooter computation (my cat's thinking) is similar to the Dorian computation (my other cat's 
thinking)".

Of course, this all hinges on some particular, maybe perverse, understanding of 
"computation". But it's a much more wranglable word than "mind".

On 2/20/23 04:10, Santafe wrote:
So there are things in DaveW’s very helpful post below about which I am 
genuinely curious.  My tendency is to analyze them, though I have a certain 
habitual fear that asking a question in an analytic mode will come across as 
somehow disrespectful, and that is not my intent.

The description below sounds to me very much like “essentialism”.  If we have 
long human experience that water is wet, and if after many hundreds of millenia 
being human (and longer bring primates etc.) we take on some good reasons to 
describe water as being made of H2O molecules, the essentialist habit is to 
suppose (to take as a philosophical premise?) that there must be some attribute 
of wetness about each molecule, which is then amplified when many such 
molecules make the bulk that even ordinary people experience as water.  (One 
could go on a branch and argue that special people also experience each 
individual molecule as itself and can attest to its wetness, and one could try 
to push the analogy that far, but I want to focus above on the essentialist 
premise as a kind of “mind-set background”.)

One could be essentialist about really anything.  The wetness of water, the 
hardness of rock, the warmness of air, the loyalty of friends, or pretty much 
anything that has syntax making such a construction possible.

In the Mind community, is the central orientation a commitment to essentialism 
as a posture, or is essentialism only to be applied to whatever specifically 
comes under the scope of “mind”?

If only mind is to be framed in this kind of essentialist ontology, why does it 
become the only attribute thus deserving to be framed as an essence?  Of 
course, for me to ask that already expresses the point of view that the Mind 
community are arguing against: that people are a tiny and late corner in a 
large universe, and that all this conversation about Mind didn’t come into 
existence until they were there to generate it, which seems almost as tiny and 
niche as any particular one of Shakespeare’s plays.  But to put the question 
that way is the only way I know to use language.

--
ꙮ Mɥǝu ǝlǝdɥɐuʇs ɟᴉƃɥʇ' ʇɥǝ ƃɹɐss snɟɟǝɹs˙ ꙮ

-. --- - / ...- .- .-.. .. -.. / -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Fridays 9a-12p Friday St. Johns Cafe   /   Thursdays 9a-12p Zoom 
https://bit.ly/virtualfriam
to (un)subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:  5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to