Well trolled!  It’s time for me to turn of the news for a while.  I am even 
closer to hysteria than usual.  

 

I want to say it shouldn’t  MATTER who said it;  it should only matter whether 
it’s true or not.  It’s the “true, shmoo 
<https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/this-website-works-better-in-microsoft-edge-160fa918-d581-4932-9e4e-1075c4713595?ui=en-us&rs=en-us&ad=us>
 !” move that drives me crazy.  I concede that complexity thinking should turn 
us all into hopeless dyonesians, but I will not have it!

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Prof David West
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2021 9:46 AM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird 
flocks

 

Nick,

 

Nothing you say below or said in the original post is false. All are true. 
Trump could not have written what you wrote, he lacks the literacy as well as 
the ability to avoid "hyperisms" in his speech.

 

However ... each of your points about the Chinese in both posts have been 
stated by Trump; albeit in his distorted/garbled playground bully vernacular.

 

The Epoch Times is a Falun Gong mouthpiece with a huge anti-China bias. 
Nevertheless it has/does publish essays and news pieces that also state, just 
as eloquently as do you, the same points and warnings about what China is doing 
and why.

 

What I am teasing you (trolling with a huge smile on my face because I think 
the world of you) about — via the ad hominen — is the fact that "truth" 
(non-falsity) of the statements made are somehow made dependent on the identity 
of the messenger. When Trump or the Epoch Times makes the statements they are 
racist cant, but when Nick states them, they are wisdom to paid attention to.

 

davew

 

 

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, at 10:11 PM, thompnicks...@gmail.com 
<mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>  wrote:

Dave,

 

So, ad hominem aside, which of the assertions  I made are false.   Is Hong Kong 
not being digested as we speak?  Is pressure not increasing on the Taiwanese?  
Are islands not being built and fortified in the international waters around 
China?  Are the Uighurs not being confined in work camps?   Are the Chinese not 
massively deploying surveillance technology?  Look, I don’t hold it against the 
Chinese.  Given our behavior in the last decade, I think a very good case can 
be made for the superiority of authoritarian rule in the avoidance of economic 
and social chaos.  If democracies are capable of producing Hitlers and Trumps 
and the current Turkish and Hungarian leaders, which exactly IS their special 
call on our loyalty.  Could that loyalty just be so much romantic twaddle.  The 
democratical citizens of Athens murdered an entire defenseless city of their 
fellow Greeks—put them to the sword, I believe is how Thucydides put it.   I 
don’t happen to agree with the argument, but I don’t have to think of the 
Chinese as some hideous yellow peril to believe that they sincerely believe it. 
 I just have to think that they are expanding, as we did after the cold war, 
into a vacuum left by our own sudden ambivalence concerning our own values.  I 
don’t believe that Trump could have written the above, but even if he could, a 
stopped clock has to be right two times a day (or only once, if it is a twenty 
four our clock.) 

 

I would love to believe that I am wrong about any of this.  Democracies are 
caving all over the world and I think it’s fair to say that a majority of 
americans have given up on the idea as well. 

 

The one thing I am desperately naïve about and that complexity denies is that 
it is valuable to think ahead, to plan, to share plans with fellow citizens, 
and to follow some fair rules for arriving at a consensus, being ever vigilant 
for the perils of mob psychology and group think, before taking action.  All of 
that is in peril, right now, and when the history is written it will have been 
us that let it happen. 

 

N

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > On 
Behalf Of Prof David West

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 9:39 PM

To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> 

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird 
flocks

 

Nick, get out your dagger repellent you Trumpist you!

 

I have heard, almost verbatim, your entire paragraph from the mouth of the 
Donald, and seen the exact same notions discussed, ad nauseam,  in Glen's 
favorite newspaper, The Epoch Times. [Don't shoot me glen, it is a joke.]

 

davew

 

 

On Thu, Nov 11, 2021, at 11:57 AM, thompnicks...@gmail.com 
<mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>  wrote:

Steve,

 

Well, I may be the victim of recent “neo- (aka archeo-) liberal” pod casts, but 
I really get the impression that the Chinese are going for it, boasting a 
Chinese Exceptionalism every bit as toxic as the one we have espoused.  From 
their point of view, this moment in history is the analogue of our moment after 
WW two.  They are ready to move ahead and there is nobody “out there” with the 
organization or resources to oppose them.  Why would they not take the 
opportunity?  The age of sino-hegemony is upon us.  We either pull our socks up 
politically or settle down to be the new Yugoslavia. 

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> > On 
Behalf Of Steve Smith

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:58 AM

To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> 

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird 
flocks

 

Nick -

I asked this because the style of your statement felt like it had the flavor of 
Cold War Rhetoric which I was (also) raised on.   I (want to) think something 
more sophisticated (and interesting) is afoot today and that while I don't want 
to fall into the low-entropy stylization implied by this CCP Spectre, I *do* 
want to believe (or seek) something good that the CCP "great experiment" might 
have found while we were on our NeoLiberal hyperCapitalism "great experiment".  
 Is there room to learn something (humanist/humanitarian) from them?   I 
believe StephenG's familiarity with China in modern times (as well as others) 
may offer us some parallax?

- Steve

On 11/11/21 10:42 AM, thompnicks...@gmail.com <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com>  
wrote:

Steve,

 

No.  You are right on target for the thread.  My understanding of the present 
Government is that it is absolutely convinced that the centralist, 
technological, authoritarian model of government superior to other models and 
that this is their time to demonstrate that superiority.   I can really imagine 
some CCP leaders reading this research and thinking, “mmmmmmmmm!  THAT’S 
interesting.  In my back yard, back in the sixties, there was a teensy little 
CIA research station figuring out how to get animals –dogs, ravens, pigeons, 
donkeys, what-have-you, to carry bombs for them, using a combination of 
training and neural implants.  When the gave up the project, they left behind 
two gigantic glass carboys filled with pickled dogs heads. 

 

The Shadow Knows.

Nick

 

Nick Thompson

 <mailto:thompnicks...@gmail.com> thompnicks...@gmail.com

 <https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/> 
https://wordpress.clarku.edu/nthompson/

 

From: Friam  <mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com> <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On 
Behalf Of Steve Smith

Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:22 AM

To: friam@redfish.com <mailto:friam@redfish.com> 

Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Application of robo-pigeon in ethological studies of bird 
flocks

 

Nick -

 

Chinese science moves ahead in the development of the ideal society.

I don't mean to be flip in my question, but have to ask if you are being flip 
in this statement?  Can you say more about what you think the Chinese 
gov't/people/culture might be "trying" to do, either overtly, or implicitly by 
simply following their individual goals/interests/desires?   

I believe that the collective dynamics between Nations/Peoples are what is 
dominating the movement/evolution of humanity (cultural, not genetic) and that 
it is like an N-body problem in complexity and subtlety but is effected 
primarily through network relations.  

Like Gene Expression Networks, I believe that the more important "memes" (I 
think this is a useful but risky metaphorical binding that Dawkins coined for 
us most of a career (for me) ago) are those that are _regulatory_ which is why 
the likes of Trump and Bannon and Stone and the whole cabal of supervillians we 
are coping with these days focus on things like "fake news!" and "big lie!", 
etc.   In the spirit of McLuhan, "the medium IS the message", the medium itself 
becomes the _thing to manipulate_ like trying to disrupt the news credibility 
and the election process as well as becoming the definition of a tweetHole, and 
using Facebook to disseminate dysInfo etc.

I know this is an acute threadbend, you were trying to talk about birds and 
flocking and experimental techniques for studying same...  if you do feel 
inclined to answer, it is probably best to rethread.

https://jin.imrpress.com/article/2020/1757-448X/1757-448X-19-3-443.shtml

If the robo-pigeon is a dominant member of the flock, you can make the flock do 
loop-di-loops by commanding the robo-pigeon to loop.  If subordinate, the 
loop-di-looping behavior of the robopigeon has no effect on the flock.  A 
robo-pigeon is one with a brain implant and pigeons are operated on AFTER their 
dominance in the flock has been determined.

 

I hope I have this all right.  

Nick

 

 

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam

un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

 

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam

un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 

un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

 

 

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv

Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam 
<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam> 

un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com

FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/

archives:

5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/

1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

 

 

.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to