There seems to be individual differences in how people have responded to the 
longer stretches of the pandemic.   Some people lost benefits from the “open” 
system.  They lost access to their friends or lost their cadence.  Other people 
didn’t really notice so much or even liked having the convenience of not having 
to run around so much.  If the Chinese did lock up Searle in a room, he would 
have no one to play footsie with, and maybe he would become depressed that he 
had no one to “charm”.   But others might not even bother to shake the door 
handle, and just enjoy the peace and quiet with their conniving managers at 
arm’s 
length<https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2021/07/work-from-home-benefits/619597/>.

One problem I have with the decentralization-is-good slogan is that such 
systems may fail dramatically when the ecology changes.  For example, a 
classifier that is coupled to a many different “don’t care” variables via tiny 
weights can go haywire as soon as the distribution of the don’t care variables 
shifts (that is, the training set never had variation in these variables).   
Better in that case to find what the don’t care variables are through some 
pruning algorithm.   It could go the other way too, where a resilient 
classifier could be built on many weak classifiers that together do 
meaningfully access many weak but complementary signals.

The Unix fortune cookie comes to mind: “Any given program will expand to fill 
available memory.”
In the minimalist view, “life” are the essential processes that keep the agent 
going in the locked room.

From: Friam <friam-boun...@redfish.com> On Behalf Of Stephen Guerin
Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2021 7:55 PM
To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group <friam@redfish.com>
Subject: Re: [FRIAM] Can a robot have a soul?

Jochen,

The Chinese have a famous thought experiment called the  "John Searle Room" 
(虚构研究员, 1984).

Take the living John Searle, and place him in a sealed closed room. In a short 
time, he is no longer alive, has no cognition, no consciousness, and certainly 
no soul. Place a common conception of a robot in the same closed room (not 
isolated) and it will continue to function. According to Searle's Chinese 
Room<https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/chinese-room/>, the robot as a mere 
symbol manipulator has no true cognition, no understanding. Nor does it display 
consciousness nor a soul.

We've come to understand living processes as necessarily open and 
far-from-equilibrium with "life" being a decentralized property of the system.  
MIght cognition, consciousness, and soul (however defined) as higher-level 
properties necessarily be decentralized properties, too?

- Stephen

P.S. Didn't realize John Searle had his Emeritus status stripped from UC 
Berkeley for violating the Sexual Harassment 
policy<https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/katiejmbaker/john-searle-complaints-uc-berkeley>.
 Frank, did you study with John Searle in the 60s at Cal?

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 2:45 PM Jochen Fromm 
<j...@cas-group.net<mailto:j...@cas-group.net>> wrote:
I have watched John Searle videos on YouTube today and stumbled upon the 
question of personality again. If we assume that there is a special substance 
that makes us a person, can an advanced robot or AI acquire it? Can a robot be 
lazy, diligent, dull, intelligent, friendly, nit-picky or even creative? John 
Searle would probably say it is not a good question...
https://youtu.be/Bq2bfSzkTfU

I would say the answer is yes, because if the special substance is simply the 
personality or persistent character of a person, there is no reason why a robot 
should not be able to learn a bundle of typical behavior patterns (i.e. special 
mappings between perceptions and actions) that are characteristic for a person, 
even if this behavior is implemented totally differently. The resulting 
personality helps to define and maintain the identity of a person
https://youtu.be/WwipmspceOU

What do you think? Is there a special substance that makes us a person, and can 
an advanced robot or AI acquire it?

-J.


.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  
bit.ly/virtualfriam<http://bit.ly/virtualfriam>
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/
.-- .- -. - / .- -.-. - .. --- -. ..--.. / -.-. --- -. .--- ..- --. .- - .
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Zoom Fridays 9:30a-12p Mtn UTC-6  bit.ly/virtualfriam
un/subscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/
archives:
 5/2017 thru present https://redfish.com/pipermail/friam_redfish.com/
 1/2003 thru 6/2021  http://friam.383.s1.nabble.com/

Reply via email to