Hm. Maybe you're right. Maybe I've been *told* I'm anti-social and simply been a victim of those over-socialized people who don't show much depth in social contexts. Regardless, the topical question I raised still stands: For those poor sailors who *feel* demeaned by the algorithmic context, how *quickly* can/do they transition into and out of the modes?
Dave raised this question implicitly by arguing that there are at least 2 modes: training as a cog in the machine but performing as a dynamic individual. The question is how often, how fast, etc these mode-switches happen. On 1/15/19 11:09 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote: > If you were really antisocial, you wouldn't care how you seem. It seems to > me this is more a tactic for executing conversations rather than a necessity. > One could merely inhibit the self in various ways topic by topic. As for > alcohol, it actually becomes easier for me to do this, as my inner nihilist > comes out who doesn't feel the need to reconcile the every single thing my > nutcase discussant has to say. -- ☣ uǝlƃ ============================================================ FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/ FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove
