Good question.  An individual discussing a topic implies a deep, historical, 
perspective on the part of the discussant.  When I engage individuals (with 
deep structure and historicity), I have a lot of work to do to carry on a 
healthy conversation.  Such work is exhausting.  Even a *social* person will 
tire eventually.  I tire quickly.  And if you double down and apply alcohol to 
the context, then while you may *think* you're doing the required work to 
listen empathetically and treat the individuals with respect (including 
yourself), things like alcohol trick you.  You think you're doing a good job of 
it.  But you should know that you're not.  The more you drink, the less 
competent at that work you become.

So, the answer is to adopt roles when shallowness is required.  If, in that 
rare instance, depth is required, you can then commit to the work (or bail 
because you know you're not in a competent state).

There's another, more subtle, reason to adopt roles.  To have a fully Socratic 
conversation, you have to commit to an extra extent to play along with things 
your authentic, fully complex, individual self may not agree with.  The most 
well-known role is Devil's Advocate.  But there are many others.  If I don't 
adopt the role, I end up just sitting there listening politely ... which people 
have told me seems "aloof" or "stand-off-ish".

My last best story in this vein was when some guests raised the issue of gun 
control.  My full individual believes everyone should have lots of big powerful 
guns and fire at will.  My socially adjusted subset of roles adopted argue that 
guns are *the* material cause of gun deaths and, rationally, should be 
restricted.  How they should be restricted further subdivides that subset of 
roles.

On 1/15/19 10:26 AM, Marcus Daniels wrote:
> Glen writes:
> 
> < It's truly a breath of fresh air when I run across someone else who is 
> willing to swap roles several times through a single conversation. >
>  
> Why do there have to be roles and not just topics?


-- 
☣ uǝlƃ

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to