If you were really antisocial, you wouldn't care how you seem.   It seems to me 
this is more a tactic for executing conversations rather than a necessity.   
One could merely inhibit the self in various ways topic by topic.   As for 
alcohol, it actually becomes easier for me to do this, as my inner nihilist 
comes out who doesn't feel the need to reconcile the every single thing my 
nutcase discussant has to say.

On 1/15/19, 11:39 AM, "Friam on behalf of uǝlƃ ☣" <friam-boun...@redfish.com 
on behalf of geprope...@gmail.com> wrote:

    There's another, more subtle, reason to adopt roles.  To have a fully 
Socratic conversation, you have to commit to an extra extent to play along with 
things your authentic, fully complex, individual self may not agree with.  The 
most well-known role is Devil's Advocate.  But there are many others.  If I 
don't adopt the role, I end up just sitting there listening politely ... which 
people have told me seems "aloof" or "stand-off-ish".

============================================================
FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
to unsubscribe http://redfish.com/mailman/listinfo/friam_redfish.com
archives back to 2003: http://friam.471366.n2.nabble.com/
FRIAM-COMIC http://friam-comic.blogspot.com/ by Dr. Strangelove

Reply via email to