External Email - Use Caution        

Ok I will test it on normal subjects.

Do I have to put this -bigventricles flag on all recon-all commands
following manual editing of brainmask, white matter,...etc or just once at
the first recon-all -all command ?

Best,
Matthieu

Le mar. 18 sept. 2018 à 18:03, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> a
écrit :

> I think it should be ok. It will be a bit slower, but shouldn't reduce
> accuracy I don't think. Try it and see
> Bruce
> On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Matthieu
> Vanhoutte wrote:
>
> >
> >         External Email - Use Caution
> >
> > Hi Bruce,
> >
> > Thanks, but in this case will recon-all with -bigventricles flag work
> well on normal patients
> > without big ventricles ?
> >
> > Best,
> > Matthieu
> >
> > 2018-09-18 15:56 GMT+00:00 Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>:
> >       Hi Matthieu
> >
> >       yes, you will want to run all of your subjects with it
> >
> >       cheers
> >       Bruce
> >       On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, Matthieu Vanhoutte wrote:
> >
> >
> >                     External Email - Use Caution
> >
> >             Dear Bram,
> >
> >             It looks like the -bigventricles flag fixed my problem with
> my specific
> >             subject. Not only, this took
> >             into account large ventricles but also corrected grey matter
> segmentation
> >             from extra Dura tissue
> >             that was erroneously segmented in GM.
> >
> >             I understand the first point of amelioration allowed by the
> flag but don't
> >             understand where the
> >             second point come from ?
> >
> >             If I used the -bigventricles flag for all my atrophied and
> large ventricles
> >             patients and not for my
> >             healthy patients, wouldn't it introduce a bias when further
> statistically
> >             comparing groups between
> >             them ?
> >
> >             Best,
> >             Matthieu
> >
> >             2018-09-14 15:35 GMT+00:00 Diamond, Bram Ryder <
> brdiam...@mgh.harvard.edu>:
> >                   If you haven't already, you may want to run the
> subject through
> >             recon-all with the
> >                   -bigventricles flag since it looks like the
> lateral ventricle was
> >             significantly
> >                   mislabeled in the aseg. If using the -bigventricles
> flag doesn't fix
> >             your problem, you
> >                   can edit the aseg.mgz manually by following the
> directions in this
> >             tutorial. Then run
> >                   the following command (again, substituting <subj_id>
> for your
> >             subject's id):
> >             recon-all -autorecon2-noaseg -autorecon3 -subjid <subj_id>
> >
> >             I would try this before doing the wm.mgz edits I suggested
> in my previous
> >             email.
> >
> >             Best,
> >             Bram
> >
> >
> ___________________________________________________________________________________________________
> >             _
> >             From: freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >             <freesurfer-boun...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu> on
> >             behalf of Diamond, Bram Ryder <brdiam...@mgh.harvard.edu>
> >             Sent: Friday, September 14, 2018 11:07:42 AM
> >             To: matthieuvanhou...@gmail.com
> >             Cc: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu;
> astev...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> >             Subject: [Freesurfer] Troubles to determine the type of
> recon editing needed
> >
> >
> >             Hi Matthieu,
> >
> >
> >             I've taken a look through the files you shared with us and I
> see the poor
> >             surfaces in the
> >             posterior right hemisphere you were referring to in your
> message. It looks
> >             like your subject
> >             has a combination of abnormally large ventricles and
> significant wm
> >             abnormalities, so I'm
> >             surprised FreeSurfer did as well as it did.
> >
> >
> >             As for the recon editing - I would recommend editing the
> wm.mgz to more
> >             accurately represent
> >             the wm from slice 84 to 39. You can take a look at the white
> matter edits
> >             tutorial for details
> >             on how to do that. Then run the following command
> (substituting <subj_id>
> >             for your
> >             subject's id):
> >
> >
> >             recon-all -autorecon2-wm -autorecon3 -subjid <subj_id>
> >
> >
> >             The surface reconstruction may also benefit from labeling
> the right lateral
> >             ventricle in the
> >             wm.mgz (as an intensity of 250) - but I'm not certain since
> you didn't send
> >             us the surfaces
> >             for the left hemisphere. Before you do that, edit the wm.mgz
> as explained in
> >             the tutorial and
> >             tell us how that goes.
> >
> >
> >             All the best,
> >
> >             Bram
> >
> >
> >             Bram R. Diamond, BSc
> >             Research Technician II
> >             Laboratory for Computational Neuroimaging
> >             Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging
> >             Massachusetts General Hospital
> >             149 13th Street
> >             Charlestown, MA 02129
> >             (p): 617-726-6598
> >
> >             The information in this e-mail is intended only for the
> person to whom it is
> >             addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in
> error and the
> >             e-mail
> >             contains patient information, please contact the Partners
> Compliance
> >             HelpLine at
> >             http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was
> sent to you in
> >             error
> >             but does not contain patient information, please contact the
> sender and
> >             properly
> >             dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Freesurfer mailing list
> > Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> > https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
> >
> >
> > The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom
> it is
> > addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> > contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> > http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you
> in error
> > but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> > dispose of the e-mail.
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to