you could get a T2 or FLAIR and use it to fix the pial surface
On Fri, 1 Aug 
2014, McLaughlin, Katie wrote:

> Hi Andre and Bruce,
>
> Thanks for your input here.  The sat band has helped, although it hasn't 
> entirely corrected the problem (the image attached was from a subject with 
> the sat bands included).  We are using a local transmit coil.
>
> I'm going to check with our physicist about the inversion pulse - thanks for 
> the suggestion.
>
> Any other thoughts about strategies for improving this are welcome!  Andre, 
> would you mind sharing how you segmented the blood vessels and labeled in 
> FreeSurfer? We could try that approach...
>
> Thanks,
> Kate
>
> ________________________________________
> From: [email protected] 
> [[email protected]] on behalf of Andre van der Kouwe 
> [[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 1:00 PM
> To: Bruce Fischl; Freesurfer support list
> Cc: Dylan Tisdall
> Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] High intensity blood vessels in children with 
> meMPRAGE
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks, yes, we have this problem on our scans from the Allegra and 7 T
> scanners, where there's a local transmit coil (no body transmit coil)
> and therefore blood with non-inverted spins enters the head after the
> inversion pulse and appears bright in the images. With our Allegra scans
> this has indeed caused problems with FreeSurfer, where the vessels are
> included as part of some labelled structures. I did try to segment and
> label the vessels with only partial success (since the images are
> already collected). In your case, a sat band might help... is your
> inversion pulse non-selective? If you have an axial slab and axial
> slab-selective inversion, maybe just making the inversion pulse
> non-selective will help. If the coil has no coverage of the neck, I
> guess your sat band won't work and you'll have to address the issue in
> post-processing. Sorry, I don't have a specific solution, but we've also
> seen the problem. First thing perhaps is to verify whether you're using
> a local transmit coil.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Andre.
>
> On 08/01/2014 12:50 PM, Bruce Fischl wrote:
>> Hi Kate
>>
>> I'll cc Andre and Dylan, but I would have thought some sat bands in the
>> neck would do it. I think vessels are usually bright in the mprage, but
>> don't usually case problems. Comments welcome....
>>
>> cheers
>>
>> Bruce
>>
>> On Fri, 1 Aug 2014, McLaughlin, Katie wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Doug, Bruce, et al.
>>> We've used the MGH meMPRAGE protocol successfully with children and
>>> adolescents previously on a Siemens 3T.  I've recently moved to a new
>>> institution and am using the protocol on a Philips 3T Achieva scanner and
>>> we've been having a lot of issues with high-intensity blood vessels
>>> (appearing bright white and interfering with segmentation in FreeSurfer).
>>>  Screenshot of an example attached.
>>>
>>> We have added some rest slabs/sat bands to the protocol to address
>>> this, but
>>> it hasn't fully solved the problem.
>>>
>>> I'm wondering if you have any recommendations about adjusting things in
>>> FreeSurfer to help us get better segmentation?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your thoughts on this,
>>> Kate
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine 
> at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in 
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and 
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer

Reply via email to