Hey Bruce.

 I've sent one of my subjects in which I noticed the segmentation problems
in the occipital lobe. Sagittal slice 115 provides a good example. I've
also noticed that with my subjects I frequently have problems with
segmentation of the temporal lobes, although adding control points usually
fixes this quite well.


Thanks for your help

Matt



On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
wrote:

> Hi Matt
>
> there are instructions on our wiki. You can either ftp or use the
> filedrop, although ftp is probably best if you are uploading an entire
> subject
>
>
> cheers
> Bruce
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
>
>  Hey Bruce.
>> Thanks for the response. How do I go about uploading the subject?
>>
>> On Monday, July 28, 2014, Bruce Fischl <fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
>> wrote:
>>       Hi Matt
>>
>>       certainly something is wrong, but it's hard to tell why from the
>>       single slice. You have big topological defects that are being
>>       fixed incorrectly. Can you upload the subject and we will take a
>>       look?
>>       cheers
>>       Bruce
>>       On Mon, 28 Jul 2014, Walton, Matt wrote:
>>
>>             Hello Freesurfer team,
>>             I've used freesurfer to segment (recon-all)
>>              approximately 30 different
>>             subjects from a study. I've noticed that a large
>>             number of these subjects
>>             have a misclassification of the white and pial
>>             boundaries in the occipital
>>             lobe (such that grey matter is being classified as
>>             white matter). I believe
>>             this problem is originating from my scanner and
>>             original data. I'm acquiring
>>             a T1W BRAVO sequence on a GE Discovery 750w 3T
>>             scanner, using a 32 channel
>>             phased array head coil. For many subjects, this
>>             acquistion gives intensity
>>             inhomogeneity in the occipital lobe.  I've begun
>>             using a GE based correction
>>             technique (PURE) on the images, and it appears to
>>             improve the intensity in
>>             the occipital lobe, but Freesurfer is still
>>             frequently misclassifying.
>>
>>             I'm wondering what would be the best way to edit the
>>             data. I've often tried
>>             to edit the wm.vol, but this doesn't seem to fix
>>             anything. For the most
>>             part, the wm.vol is correct to begin with, but the
>>             wm cutting line isn't
>>             segmenting with the wm.vol. I've also tried to add
>>             control points but this
>>             doesn't seem to improve anything either.
>>
>>             I've attached an image which I hope will further
>>             explain my problems.
>>
>>             Thanks for any help
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Freesurfer mailing list
> Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
> https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
>
>
> The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it
> is
> addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the
> e-mail
> contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance
> HelpLine at
> http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in
> error
> but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and
> properly
> dispose of the e-mail.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer


The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.

Reply via email to