Hi, I just mapped these on the fsaverage lh.inflated. By images of the folding patterns, do you mean pial or smoothwm images from fsaverage? Or do you mean data from single subjects?
LMR > Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:01:31 -0400 > From: fis...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > To: lari...@gmail.com > CC: freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu; destri...@med.univ-tours.fr; > ra...@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu > Subject: Re: [Freesurfer] Destrieux or Desikan/Ron Killiany > > Hi Lars, > > you need to send images of the folding patterns for Christophe and Rahul > to decide. > > cheers, > Bruce > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009, Lars M. Rimol wrote: > > > Hi, > > I have an area of significance on the mesial surface of the hemisphere > > (please see attached tiffs). I would like to know if it is exclusively in > > the cingulate or in cingulate and SFG. The prolbem is that the two atlases > > don't agree. The upper more than half of this significant area is in SFG > > according to lh.aparc.annot and in cingulate gyrus and sulcus according to > > lh.aparc.a2005s.annot. > > > > I know there have been some issues before with cingulate and SFG in the > > Destrieux atals ( > > http://www.mail-archive.com/freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/msg05399.html) > > but it's unlcear to me whether these have been resolved. As you can see from > > the tiffs, in lh.aparc.annot the significant area is inside the corpus > > callosum (a small part), caudal and rostral ant. cingulate, and SFG. In > > lh.aparc.a2005s.annot it is inside pericallosal sulcus, g. cingulate main > > part, s. cingulate main part, and only a very small part of it extends into > > SFG. > > These are substantially different interpretations. Is one atlas more > > accurate in this region? > > > > > > Thank you! > > > >
_______________________________________________ Freesurfer mailing list Freesurfer@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
