I see. 1x1x1 with standard coils is pretty noisy at 1.5T. That's why we
used to use 1.3x1.3x1 instead, although now we do 1mm is at 3T with a 12
or 32 channel. Sorry, it's hard to describe what to fix since it depends on
exactly what happened. You have to find what string of wm voxels in the
wm.mgz are causing the connection and erase them. If you can't find it, you
can upload and we'll take a look.
cheers,
Bruce
p.s. your CNR will increase if you miniize the TE. I would think you can
get it less than 5.4ms, but I don't remember what the Vision gradients are
like
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
What should I erase? Sorry, I did mean to say I saw the surface errors
overlaid on the volume, but couldn't discern any in the wm.mgz alone.
It's 3D FLASH on a Vision 1.5T, TR/TE= 20/5.4 ms, flip=30 deg, 1
acquisition, 1x1x1 mm^3 voxels. Nothing fancy, maybe that's the
problem...
-Derin
it looks like there is an (incorrect) connection in the wm.mgz from the
temporal lobe across the insula. The data also looks really noisy - what
is the acquisition? You'll need to erase some stuff form the wm.mgz I
think.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
Here is a pic of the inflated.nofix, how do I know what to edit? I've
checked the wm.mgz and it looks fine (at least I can't see any errors).
Maybe I'm missing something, I've attached a shot of it as well.
Thanks.
-Derin
look at the ?h.inflated.nofix to see what is causing the defect, and
correct the wm.mgz manually to remove it. Jenni: can you point Derin at
the
appropriate wiki page?
thanks,
Bruce
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
The ?h.orig.nofix looks ok, meaning it follows the white-gray boundary
appropriately. What should I try next?
-Derin
this is probably a topology fixing problem. Look at the ?h.orig.nofix
and
see how it is
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
Did you mean wm.mgz? It looks fine. The orig surface is not good
either.
Here's a pic.
-Derin
Hi Derin,
What does the orig surface look like? and the wm? Are those
correct?
Jenni
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Derin Cobia wrote:
I have two subjects where the white surface does not follow the
gray-white
gradient (see attached pic for example). Is there any way to fix
this?
I'm assuming it has to do with the limitations of my scan too
(it's
FLASH
data). I'm running 3.0.4, thanks.
-Derin
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
_______________________________________________
Freesurfer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://mail.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/mailman/listinfo/freesurfer
