Thank you for the insights. I was not really aware of memory management and I didn't really question in advance which DOS version fits my machine best.
I did spend a lot of time installing FreeDOS 1.4 and it runs, however that doesn't mean it's a good choice. If I get it right, DR-DOS 3.41 is small in size, offers more free RAM, and is designed for 16-bit. For such reasons, it's more suitable for my setup. I would still like to ask, since DR-DOS 3.41 is an earlier release, some features will be cut compared to newer ones for sure. But to what extent? On Sat, Jul 12, 2025 at 12:20 AM Liam Proven via Freedos-user < freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 at 16:14, Lutalli via Freedos-user > <freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > By the way, among MS-DOS 6.22, DR-DOS 7.03 and FreeDOS 1.0, how should I > choose the "best" one if I were to? What are the differences? > > None of them. All built for 32-bit machines with memory management. > > Like I said: DR-DOS 3.41. > > > -- > Liam Proven ~ Profile: https://about.me/liamproven ~ LinkedIn/X/FB: > lproven > Email: lpro...@cix.co.uk ~ Google: lpro...@gmail.com > IoM: (+44) 7624 227612: UK: (+44) 7939-087884 > Czech [+ WhatsApp/Telegram/Signal]: (+420) 702-829-053 > > > _______________________________________________ > Freedos-user mailing list > Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user >
_______________________________________________ Freedos-user mailing list Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user
