> On Oct 23, 2024, at 4:03 PM, Eric Auer via Freedos-user 
> <freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I agree that the monthly releases have many good updates.
> For FreeDOS 1.4, we should finally add WfW 3.11 compatible
> kernel and related tools (maybe share exe etc.?) as well.
> 
> Regards, Eric

Don’t know about WFW.

Personally, I think 1.4 should have a newer kernel and FreeCOM. They both have 
had minor and major fixes since 1.3. Don’t know when either is coming. Plus, 
they will need a lot of testing before we can release a new OS version.


> 
>> I think this demonstrates that FreeDOS 1.3 is getting a bit old (2022)
>> and the monthly test releases have far outpaced it. For example, we
>> already dropped Seal and oZone in the monthly test releases; the test
>> releases have only had OpenGEM for some time.[1] We haven't added
>> PCGEOS yet, but I'd like to see how things go with shifting packages
>> between the LiveCD and BonusCD before we look at adding something
>> large like PCGEOS. Earlier test releases[2] added other critical
>> updates to packages. The package changes in T2410 were quite good, I'm
>> interested in testing the package changes in T2411. Basically, the
>> test release is *really good* and I think we should consider pushing
>> forward to turn a future monthly test release into a "FreeDOS 1.4."
>> [1]The report from the monthly test release:
>> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/report.html
>> [2]The change log from the monthly test release:
>> https://www.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/distributions/test/changes.log
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedos-user mailing list
> Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


_______________________________________________
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

Reply via email to