> Marko Lerota wrote: > > In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says > > > > Updating Existing Systems > > > > > An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes > > > a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update > > > an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on > > > the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent > > > sets of libraries when future port upgrades rebuild one port but not > > > others that link to it. This can be done with: > > > > # portupgrade -faP > > > > etc... > > > > Why!!! > > If you never rebuild any ports at all after upgrading to a new major > version, then your ports should all continue to work as long as they can > find the old libraries they need. However, once you rebuild a port, it > will link to new libraries, and may also link to other libraries that > continue to be linked to the old libraries. You may end up with a binary > being linked against libc.so.6 and libc.so.7, which will not work. > > > Then the servers. Why should I reinstall all my databases and such? I always > > liked that FreeBSD base (OS) is separated from packages. And no matter what > > I > > do with the packages, my OS will always work. I don't want dependency > > hell like in Linux. Now you are telling me that my database might not work > > after upgrade to a new version. Is that it? > > Ports that depend on other ports are vulnerable to this problem. Ports > that only require base libraries are not. The more ports a port depends > on, the more likely you are to run into problems if you don't rebuild all > ports to begin with. > > So, if you don't ever rebuild any of your ports at all, everything should > still work until you finally do rebuild a port. At that point, if that port > doesn't depend on other ports and only links to base libraries, you'll > still be fine. Once you rebuild a port that depends on other ports, > things may break if you don't force a rebuild of every port that port > depends on.
Running "portupgrade -nrR <package-list>" repeated until <package-list> stabilised used to also work for just-in-time upgrades like this. Unfortunately "portupgrade -nrR" no longer reports packages that won't be upgraded. There are no longer any "-" entries in the output. I need to see what "portupgrade -nrRf" does before reporting this. > The paragraph you quoted above attempts to avoid that breakage and the > mailing list questions that ensue, by forcing a rebuild of all ports to > begin with. > > -- > Skip > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"