On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Warren Block <wbl...@wonkity.com> wrote
in <alpine.bsf.2.20.1508221448070.93...@wonkity.com>:
wb> It's not clear to me how people that currently have the old
wb> print/ghostscript should switch to the new version.
wb>
wb> 'portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11 ghostscript9-9.06_10' (in my
wb> case) or even just 'portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10' turns into an
wb> endless loop:
wb>
wb> ===>>> print/ghostscript9-x11 >> print/ghostscript9-x11 >>
wb> ghostscript9-9.06_10 (2/2)
wb>
wb> ===>>> The print/ghostscript9 port moved to print/ghostscript9-x11
wb> ===>>> Reason: Split into print/ghostscript9-base and
wb> print/ghostscript9-x11
wb>
wb> That will continue to recurse, adding one more print/ghostscript9-x11
wb> each time. UPDATING should show the correct method. Maybe just
wb> 'pkg delete -f ghostscript9-9.06_10' and then install
wb> print/ghostscript9-x11?
Does r395051 fix this issue?
'portmaster ghostscript' did correctly replace the old ghostscript with
ghostscript-base, but ghostscript-x11 was not installed.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
