On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 14:55 -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote: > > > Hiroki Sato <h...@freebsd.org> wrote > > in <20150821.022521.792759762853683209....@allbsd.org>: > > > > hr> So I would suggest either of the following two plans: > > hr> > > hr> Plan A: Just remove print/ghostscript*-nox11. > > ... > > > > hr> Plan B: Remove print/ghostscript*-nox11 and split the X11 > > -dependent > > hr> part of print/ghostscript9 into another port. > > > > Thank you all for your feedback! I committed changes for Plan B as > > r395047. > > > > If you have a problem after this change, please report it to me. > > Thank you for working on this. > > It's not clear to me how people that currently have the old > print/ghostscript should switch to the new version. > > 'portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11 ghostscript9-9.06_10' (in my > case) > or even just 'portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10' turns into an endless > loop: > > ===>>> print/ghostscript9-x11 >> print/ghostscript9-x11 >> > ghostscript9-9.06_10 (2/2) > > ===>>> The print/ghostscript9 port moved to > print/ghostscript9-x11 > ===>>> Reason: Split into print/ghostscript9-base and > print/ghostscript9-x11 > > That will continue to recurse, adding one more print/ghostscript9-x11 > each time. UPDATING should show the correct method. Maybe just > 'pkg delete -f ghostscript9-9.06_10' and then install > print/ghostscript9-x11? > _______________________________________________ I did pkg delete and than install again and everything works as before.
_______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
