On Sun, 23 Aug 2015, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Hiroki Sato <h...@freebsd.org> wrote
in <20150821.022521.792759762853683209....@allbsd.org>:
hr> So I would suggest either of the following two plans:
hr>
hr> Plan A: Just remove print/ghostscript*-nox11.
...
hr> Plan B: Remove print/ghostscript*-nox11 and split the X11-dependent
hr> part of print/ghostscript9 into another port.
Thank you all for your feedback! I committed changes for Plan B as
r395047.
If you have a problem after this change, please report it to me.
Thank you for working on this.
It's not clear to me how people that currently have the old
print/ghostscript should switch to the new version.
'portmaster -o print/ghostscript9-x11 ghostscript9-9.06_10' (in my case)
or even just 'portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10' turns into an endless
loop:
===>>> print/ghostscript9-x11 >> print/ghostscript9-x11 >> ghostscript9-9.06_10
(2/2)
===>>> The print/ghostscript9 port moved to print/ghostscript9-x11
===>>> Reason: Split into print/ghostscript9-base and
print/ghostscript9-x11
That will continue to recurse, adding one more print/ghostscript9-x11
each time. UPDATING should show the correct method. Maybe just
'pkg delete -f ghostscript9-9.06_10' and then install
print/ghostscript9-x11?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
