On Mon, 16 Apr 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > there is a site that calculates server uptime from these numbers. > All the leading machines are freeBSD. When you do this it will > no-longer be able to track us :-( They're using TCP timestamps to do that, not ip ids. And if I get my way, those will be unuseable for uptime detection soon enough... :) > what is the problem in having these numbers sequential? Anonymous port scans, some firewall probing as mentioned by darren, and the ability to see the idleness of a host. Not enough to make randomization the default policy, but certainly enough to justify a sysctl. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: non-random IP IDs Barney Wolff
- Re: non-random IP IDs Crist Clark
- Re: non-random IP IDs Garrett Wollman
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Niels Provos
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Julian Elischer
- Re: non-random IP IDs Mike Silbersack
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Alfred Perlstein
- Re: non-random IP IDs James Wyatt
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rob Simmons
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon