<<On Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:54:48 -0700, "Crist Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Personally, I like (b). It's right there for those who want it, but > the bloat-watchers don't have to see that extra few bytes going to > kernelland. I think this is reasonable. With the way memory subsystems work these days, we need to avoid wasting valuable cache in order to get the maximum possible performance. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: non-random IP IDs James Wyatt
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rob Simmons
- Re: non-random IP IDs Rodney W. Grimes
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Piechota
- Re: non-random IP IDs David Pick
- Re: non-random IP IDs Crist Clark
- Re: non-random IP IDs Garrett Wollman
- Re: non-random IP IDs Alfred Perlstein
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Jason DiCioccio
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed