<<On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:50:53 -0700, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Surely that can't work since the purpose of that field is for received > packet ordering No. The IP ID is effectively a nonce with respect to the receiving system. The only requirement is that IDs not be repeated while any packet with the same (source, dest) pair is still in the network. This is in practice impossible, so as with TCP we can simply pretend that all packets disappear after 60 seconds. Having said that, on the whole I think this whole idea is utterly pointless. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
- Re: non-random IP IDs Wes Peters
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs E.B. Dreger
- Re: non-random IP IDs Barney Wolff
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Barney Wolff
- Re: non-random IP IDs Crist Clark
- Re: non-random IP IDs Garrett Wollman
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Darren Reed
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Niels Provos
- Re: non-random IP IDs Matt Dillon
- Re: non-random IP IDs Julian Elischer
- Re: non-random IP IDs Mike Silbersack
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway
- Re: non-random IP IDs Kris Kennaway