On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:49PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote: > > > Personally, I'd still like LOCALBASE to move out of /usr/local. Maybe > > > it's time to reconsider that. > > Not gonna happen as a default, but you can change it on your systems > > if you like. > > Not if you want to use pre-built packages. You made sure of that when > you decided (against my objections) to include .la files in packages.
I have a suspicion you're never going to let that go, but it's not relevant here anyway. Binaries have been hardcoding their build location (e.g. /usr/local) since the dawn of time. The best you can do is to binary edit everything to a string of the same length, and that works for .la files too. Kris
pgpKZnNOfdc8l.pgp
Description: PGP signature
