Quoting Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Mon, 14 May 2007
11:31:25 +0200):
Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The existence of .la files is a bug.
I fully agree [but this needs to be addressed upstream]
Note that we are apparently not the only ones dissatisfied with this
state of affairs. The following code is commonly found in rpm specs for
Fedora (and, I suspect, for RedHat and CentOS as well):
sed -i
's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g'
libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
Perhaps we could make common cause with RH to apply pressure on the
libtool maintainers?
Isn't this a property which can be set at build time? I mean: isn't
there a $OSNAME case where this can be set for a specific OS? So it
boil down to just set those two variables accordingly in the FreeBSD
case and to send a patch to the libtool maintainers. For Linux this
isn't doable, as there are many Linux distros out there, but for
FreeBSD we can do this. But this should be tested on pointyhat first,
I think.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I'm not sure I've even got the brains to be President.
-- Barry Goldwater, in 1964
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
