In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> The point is that the real problem is: "how do you arrange the bits on
> disk", not "how do you wrap that in a package system". Until you
> figure out a workable on-disk arrangement for the files, questions
> about packaging are not relevant. And it seems that option 1 is the
> only workable one in practise (unless you have some other idea), which
> can easily be achieved today with a couple of hours of kernel hacking.
There are clearly other workable ideas - as I said, the linux folks
managed to make it work. But it's not an easy problem. I certainly
wouldn't suggest rebuilding the packaging system to deal with this,
except as part of a larger effort. On the other hand, since people are
working on the ports/package system (I see port/pkg database and some
ports infrastructure work in the current SoC projects list), not
keeping this goal in mind would seem to be a bit short-sighted. I
wouldn't be surprised if your option #1 could benefit from this as
well.
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
