Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > > > > Not if you want to use pre-built packages. You made sure of that when > > > > you decided (against my objections) to include .la files in packages. > > > I have a suspicion you're never going to let that go, but it's not > > > relevant here anyway. Binaries have been hardcoding their build > > > location (e.g. /usr/local) since the dawn of time. > > Most don't. > Assertion without proof. In fact a quick survey shows that 90% of my > /usr/local/bin references /usr/local.
I forgot to answer this bit: of course they do, if they were linked in the presence of .la files. Please understand that they are the problem, not the solution. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
