On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021115 12:17] wrote: > > :Will the knobs allow one to link /bin and /sbin against full blown > > :libc? That would be nice as we can then start using pam and user > > :management in / with dynamic modules (finally!). > > : > > :-- > > :-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I think that should be a goal. I think something like this: > > > > USE_MINIC=YES Link against the mini-C library. > > > > USE_SHARED_BIN=YES Link against a shared libc or mini-C rather > > then linking statically. > > Moiving forward I think it makes the most sense for us to maker /s?bin > dynamically linked against libc by default with options for linking > statically or dynamically against libc or mini-libc via make.conf.
I appreciate your interest but want to avoid a war so we'll just say that the _option_ to link them dynamically will be added but the default will be left up to a separate discussion, once things are well-tested in both configurations. -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
