* Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021114 15:42] wrote: > Please see earlier threads on hackers@ about bloat in libc and dynamic > linking of /[s]bin. Tim Kientzle submitted a patch that breaks exit's > dependency on malloc which saves space in the programs that don't > otherwise use malloc. > > I don't think a mini-libc is a good idea because bugfixes would need to be > duplicated or confusion about which one is being used for a program would > make debugging harder. I'd rather have the normal libc on /lib (modulo > some paring down of libc) and things dynamically linked.
I'd like to see / dynamically linked with some form of /stand that gets updated in case of emergencies. When/who is going to do this already? :) -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
