A number of our larger customers care about computation/cubic foot. The density of processors is important to them. SMP machines work well here. A future Alpha processor will be an SMT (symmetric multi threaded) machine. Above the lowest levels, it will look like a multi-CPU machine. The machine will keep multiple thread contexts live within the CPU and will be capable of switching between these threads in a single cycle. As it grows harder for compilers to find parallelism within a single thread we have had to look elsewhere to keep the machine busy. -Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Kris Kennaway
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) John Baldwin
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Matthew Jacob
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Rik van Riel
- The future of multiprocessors (was: SMP ... Greg Lehey
- Re: The future of multiprocessors (was: ... Keith Stevenson
- Re: The future of multiprocessors (was: ... Michael Adler
- Re: The future of multiprocessors (was: ... Justin Wojdacki
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) John Baldwin
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Greg Lehey
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) John Baldwin
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Sergey Babkin