> I didnt say they shouldnt support SMP, only that complicating the OS with
> highly SMP-specific code to make it slightly more efficient when 99% of
> users dont need it is a questionable endeavor.
Are you high ? What are you smoking ?
There are MANY people that use SMP, and for some of us, SMP is the choice
factor between FreeBSD and OpenBSD. I find Linux SMP vs Win2k SMP vs
FreeBSD SMP to be an important subject in enterprise class servers.
> Your point is moot, as you already have SMP support. The question is
> whether squeezing a few extra cycles out (SMPng) is worth making the OS
> significantly more complex, particularly when more computing power is
> always on the way.
Much of the code is being simplified and cleaned up. And it's not a "few
extra cycles".
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
