> > It seems that there is a lack of foresight here...you're losing a year or > more of engineering time and before SMPng is stablilized the IA-64 will be > out and most multiprocessor applications will be rushing to move over to that. > Yup, one could say that. But because this is an effort from volunteers, nobody's stock is losing value. I think Jordan pointed out a while back that nothing we're doing here, or in Linux for that matter, is all that new. -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Rik van Riel
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Michael C . Wu
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Kris Kennaway
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) janb
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Kris Kennaway
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) John Baldwin
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Matthew Jacob
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Alfred Perlstein
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Rik van Riel
- The future of multiprocesso... Greg Lehey
- Re: The future of multiproc... Keith Stevenson
- Re: The future of multiproc... Michael Adler
- Re: The future of multiproc... Justin Wojdacki
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Dennis
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) John Baldwin
- Re: SMP in 2.4 (fwd) Greg Lehey