> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Jeremiah Gowdy > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 11:30 PM > To: SteveB; Drew Eckhardt; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT >> Trouble is there is no consistency in the rulings. > United States Code Title 17 Chapter 12 Section 1201 Subsection (f) Trouble is how a judge interprets the law for a particular case. That's where the inconsistencies come from. Steve B. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: licenses (no... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Alex Belits
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Warner Losh
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Matt Dillon
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Julian Stacey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Drew Eckhardt
- RE: FreeBSD vs L... SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... SteveB
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Marco van de Voort
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Drew Eckhardt
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Wes Peters
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Sergey Babkin
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Jeremiah Gowdy
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Dag-Erling Smorgrav
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Rik van Riel
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Sergey Babkin
- Re: FreeBSD vs L... Dennis
- Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT Matt Dillon