On 2010-05-03 13:19, "C. Bergström" wrote: >> Of course it does. It forces you to make your software portable. >> > and your point is? > > Are you trying to say that s/building/porting/ between compilers is > going to magically make the software (have less bugs, more performance > or better robustness)
No, it gives you the choice of which compiler to use. > Porting could be a means-to-an-end, but still > it's not an end goal.. I'm digging at what's the end goal.. After it's > all ported what magically happens? You can then switch compilers freely, or at least, without too much effort. _______________________________________________ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
