On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 11:51:52PM +0300, Andrius Mork??nas wrote: > On Sun, 02 May 2010 10:25:22 +0300, Yuri <y...@rawbw.com> wrote: > > Having tried clang++ I have a feeling that it's not quite ready to be a > > generic c++ compiler. [snip] > > Very immature. > > Many problems that C++ ports have with clang is not related to it being > immature, they're related to the fact that clang isn't gcc and that > those ports aren't written in standard C++.
Too true. [snip] > > You will just keep stumbling upon various problems with various ports > > I've mentioned that I've been involved with ports+clang since last > October. "Stumbling upon various problems" is what I do. I'm still here, > even doing a GSoC project, so it doesn't look like "various problems" > will scare me off. And as I've mentioned above, just because some ports > don't compile, it doesn't affect this project too much. Well said, well meant. Kudos. Thanks for your work so far, and thanks for taking up that GSoC project. G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev r...@ringlet.net r...@space.bg r...@freebsd.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint 2EE7 A7A5 17FC 124C F115 C354 651E EFB0 2527 DF13 I am the meaning of this sentence.
pgpoRO1eWZrzy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
