[...] > > only one :-) performance :-) context switch is a slow operation. > > > Excuse me gentleman, who said that ? Well, Intel does :) > Take time to visit this site: > http://www.qnx.com/iat/download/index.html I know this OS. It looks great. Perhaps, it is a good choice for embeded OS. A good OS design could help to reduce context switch overhead. Just to give you some examples of context switching overhead, please take a look at http://www.atnf.csiro.au/~rgooch/benchmarks/linux-scheduler.html Thanks, emax To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... Warner Losh
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Alfred Perlstein
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Daniel O'Connor
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Ugen Antsilevitch
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... David Holloway
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Patryk Zadarnowski
- Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO