[...] > > > Worse yet: What about hardware buggy devices? > > > This could case the entiry system to crash, isn't it ? > > > > Yes, incorrectly programmed hardware either by firmware (on > > chip/board) or by drivers can cause crashes and hardware damage. > > > [...] > This design, would not let a system crash due to device > drivers problems > or even bad hardware desgin. > > What all you think about that ? only one :-) performance :-) context switch is a slow operation. Thanks, emax To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Nick Sayer
- Re: Is traditional unixes... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional un... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... Warner Losh
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Matthew Dillon
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Alfred Perlstein
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Daniel O'Connor
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Ugen Antsilevitch
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... David Holloway
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Patryk Zadarnowski
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO