* Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000406 19:24] wrote: > :Considering the current kernel design approach used by traditional > :system, what happens if a drive were wrongly coded ? > : > :Would the entiry system crash ? > > Yes. Yes, but assuming he means driver just about any wrongly coded driver under any OS has the potential to lock up or crash the entire system, I'm pretty sure I read that incorrect accesses to some devices may cause them to wedge system busses, at that point there's not much one can do besideds panic. So it's not just unix. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Kenneth Wayne Culver
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Nick Sayer
- Re: Is traditional unixes... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional un... Andrew Reilly
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Ronald G. Minnich
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... Warner Losh
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Matthew Dillon
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Alfred Perlstein
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Daniel O'Connor
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really st... Gustavo V G C Rios
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Ugen Antsilevitch
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel r... David Holloway
- Re: Is traditional unixes kern... Wes Peters
- Re: Is traditional unixes kernel reall... Patryk Zadarnowski
- RE: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ... Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO