Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ?

[Gustavo V G C Rios]

"Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" wrote:

> only one :-) performance :-) context switch is a slow operation.
> 
> Thanks,
> emax


Excuse me gentleman, who said that ?
Take time to visit this site: http://www.qnx.com/iat/download/index.html

You'll be introduced to a hard-real time OS (with a very modular
design).
The while OS fits in a single floppy with TCP/IP, GUI, web browser, http
server, and again, all that in a single floppy. HOw can it be done?

This OS uses microkernel arch.
Fill their form in order to get a book describing its OS internal arch.

Can some here explain me why such approach is not taken by FreeBSD?


PS: I never seen anything fast and reliable like that.


--
If you're happy, you're successful.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message