On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 10:59:34AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Linux has made great strides in the performance area -- the are way ahead
> of us on SMP issues, but they are definitely still behind in the
> reliable department. They almost caught up when we were going through
> our 3.0/3.1 fiasco but then fell behind again. I agree with your general
> assessment (though I'm even more rabid about NT, which I consider
> plain and simply to be a piece of crap).
>
> It interesting to note that two years ago it was well known that running
> NFSv3 under FreeBSD would destabilize it, so most people ran NFSv2.
> Even NFSv2 2 years ago had problems. Linux is just reaching the point
> now with NFSv2 where we were with NFSv3 two years ago. Thus in regards
> to NFS, FreeBSD is about 2 years ahead of Linux. At this time both
> NFSv2 and NFSv3 under FreeBSD are considered stable and reliable.
>
Re NFS stability. What version of the 3.x branch contained the updated NFS
code? 3.3?
Thanks,
sk
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
